Sat.-Sun.,
7/28-7/29/12 Deborah
Baumgold
10-2:50 305
MCK
166 LA Office
hrs: Th, 8/2, 2-5
CRN 42133
PS 399
Democracy in Theory
and Practice
What is
democracy? The concrete answer is that
it’s a method for making political decisions, including choosing
governments. The Greek word roughly
translates as “power” (kratia) to the “people” (demos). This has turned out to take many different
political forms in practice and to convey different ideas concerning the
relationship between people and their government. During this weekend course, we will examine
and compare a variety of forms of democracy and voting procedures including:
pure democracy, representative democracy and divided government, majoritarian
and proportional electoral systems. The
course concludes with discussion of the impact of social media.
READ as much as you
can of the required readings listed below in ADVANCE of the class.
Requirements:
Students are required to attend all weekend classes, read the required readings,
and write a 6-10 pp. paper during the following week. Paper topics are listed below, following the syllabus. The paper is due by Monday, 8/6, 5 P.M.
Course Outline and
Reading Assignments
Reading assignments
are posted on Blackboard.
Saturday, July 28, 2012
Session I:
Alternatives: Pure democracy/Ancient Athens
Required reading:
Bernard Manin, Principles of Representative Government, chap. 1.
Session II:
Alternatives: Representative Democracy & Divided Government
Required reading: James
Madison, Federalist Papers, #10.
Session III: How
voting systems affect outcomes
Required reading: William
Riker, Liberalism against Populism,
selections.
Sunday, July 29, 2012
Session IV:
Electoral systems
Required reading:
Lijphart, “Electoral Systems: Majority and Plurality Methods Versus
Proportional
Representation,” in Patterns of Democracy,
pp. 143-70.
Session V:
Electoral systems
Required reading:
Lijphart, “Reforming the House: Three Moderately Radical
Proposals,” PS 31:1 (1998), pp. 10-13.
Session VI: Impact
of social media
Readings: TBA
FINAL ESSAYS DUE AUGUST
6TH. Essays must e-mailed as
a Word attachment to baumgold@uoregon.edu.
Incompletes
for the essay assignment will be granted only in exceptional emergency
circumstances (such as death in the immediate family or serious illness; family
visits, vacations, and work for other classes do not count). In all other cases, the grade will be based
on work completed before the due date, which may result in a failing
grade. The grade “I” for an Incomplete
may be assigned only after the instructor and student have completed and signed
a Contract for the Grade of Incomplete;
the form is available on the Political Science website at
http:polisci.uoregon.edu.
Paper Assignment
& Topics
Due date: Monday, August 6, 2012, 5 P.M.
Assignment: Choose one of the
following topics for a 6-10 page paper.
Good papers will organize discussion of the theories around a central
argument/thesis. This thesis should be
stated in the first paragraph of the paper (which should not simply quote one of the questions below.) Then, develop
your argument using and analyzing textual material. Textual material must be adequately and
correctly footnoted. Academic dishonesty
will result in failure of the course.
1. Analyze and
assess the results of the class simulation of various voting methods.
Analysis:
Why do the
various methods produce different outcomes?
Are there patterns to the outcomes?
(Examine each method to see whether it favors a particular sort of
candidate. Consider patterns among the
outcomes. For instance, do majoritarian
methods produce systematically different outcomes from positional methods and,
if so, why?)
Assessment:
Based on your
analysis, assess the fairness of these electoral methods. Which
method or methods is
the best (or better), and why?
Base your analysis on the data provided in the hand-outs on the three
elections and the assigned reading in Riker, Liberalism against Populism.
2. Design and defend an
ideal voting system, based on the reading materials assigned in this course. As
part of your defense, explain why this system would be better than others.
You are welcome (even encouraged) to combine different voting systems,
using
different systems for
different parts of government. Explain
how the parts of
your system would work
well together.
HINT
Relevant parameters include:
elections vs. lot;
plurality (winner-take-all) vs. proportional representation.