Political Science 399
The Political Economy of North-South Relations
Professor
Genie Baker
|
Class |
Office |
|
Fall 2004 |
Hours: Mon 4-6 & by appt. |
|
MW 2-3:20 |
920 PLC, 346-4623 |
|
112 Lillis |
genie@darkwing.uoregon.edu |
The
contours of contemporary international political science took shape in the
aftermath of the two World Wars, and so has historically been dominated by the
study of great power politics. In recent
years, though, it has become clear that some of the most significant challenges
in the international system come from the developing world – by and large,
countries south of the equator. From an
economic perspective, financial crises in Asia and
At the same time, development scholars
have recognized that political and economic transformations in today’s
developing world cannot be understood without reference to the international
environment imposed by the wealthiest countries in the world – for the most
part, countries north of the equator.
This course will introduce the changing perspectives and current
controversies concerning the appropriate “rules of the game” for the
international economic system. Should
developing countries be given special consideration in trade and financial
agreements? Do international financial
institutions (IFIs) like the IMF, the World Bank and the WTO act in the
interest of the world as a whole or serve the narrower interest of the powerful
north? How are domestic imperatives
balanced with global aims?
The course will be based primarily on readings made available through blackboard (https://blackboard.uoregon.edu); any changes to the syllabus will also be posted there. In addition, we will read most of the following books:
Paul Blustein (2003) The Chastening: Inside the Crisis that Rocked the Global Financial System and Humbled the IMF. Public Affairs.
Joseph E.
Stiglitz (2002) Globalization and its Discontents.
Course Requirements and Grading
· Two of three pop quizzes, 5% each, 10% total: There will be 3 unannounced pop quizzes during the term; they will cover assigned readings and lectures. Your top two quiz scores will be used to compute your final grade, so there will be no penalty if you miss one quiz. There will be no makeup quizzes.
· Midterm Exam, 40%: The in-class midterm will be held Monday, November 1st, and will include both short answer and essay questions.
· Final, 50%. Undergraduates will write a take-home final. Graduate students may write a term paper instead.
Late or missed assignments: If you miss the midterm exam, you will need a medical excuse to take a make-up examination. If you submit a late final exam/paper, you will need a medical excuse to avoid a 5-point per day penalty. (100 points total.)
Academic Integrity, Plagiarism, Fabrication, Cheating,
and Misconduct:
I strongly believe that a university degree should be a sign of significant accomplishment and a source of great pride, and therefore maintain a zero-tolerance-for-cheating policy. Make sure you are familiar with the University Policy on Academic Dishonesty. Anyone suspected of committing an act of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Director of Student Judicial Affairs. Those found guilty will receive an F in the class, and may be subject to additional penalties such as expulsion, suspension, negative notation on the transcript, revocation of the degree, disciplinary probation, community service, loss of privileges, or conduct reprimand.
University guidelines concerning academic dishonesty are described in http://www.uoregon.edu/~conduct/sai.htm, and http://libweb.uoregon.edu/guides/plagiarism/students/ . Make sure you are familiar with them, as lack of familiarity or “unintentional” cheating will not be considered a legitimate defense.
Week 1: Introduction
Optional
Moisés Naím (2003) “The Five Wars of Globalization.” Foreign Policy, 134 (January-February): 29-37.
Bernard Gordon (2003) “A High-Risk Trade Policy.” Foreign Affairs 82,4 (July-August):105-18.
Mike Moore (2003) “Multilateral Meltdown.” Foreign Policy 135 (March-April):74-75.
Kenneth Rogoff (2003) “The IMF Strikes Back.” Foreign Policy 134 (January-February):39-46.
Reading: Joan Spero and Jeffrey Hart, The Politics of International Economic
Relations 6th ed., chapter 5 (pp.
171-191).
Week 2: Some History, Introduction to International
Institutions
· Oct. 6: The International Trading System
Week 3: Politics and
International Institutions
·
Oct. 11: Theoretical Perspectives
G. John Ikenberry (2003) “
Robert Rothstein (1988) “Epitaph for a Monument to a Failed Protest? A North-South Retrospective.” International Organization 42,4 (Autumn): 725-48.
Stephen Krasner (1999) “Theories of International
Institutions and International Politics.”
Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy.
· Oct. 13: Current Politics
Moisés Naím (2000) “A Talk with Michel Camdessus: The Exit Interview.” Foreign Policy 120 (September-October):32-45.
Stephen Fidler (2001) “Who’s Minding the Bank?” Foreign Policy 126 (September-October):40-50.
Blustein, chapters 1 and 2.
Week
4: Introduction to Development Economics
·
Oct. 18: Overview of Economic Development
·
Oct. 20: Economic Growth
Blustein, pp. 48-70.
Stiglitz, ch. 1.
Week
5: Internal Financing of Development
· Oct. 25: Seignorage and Taxation
Robert Gilpin (2001) “The State and Economic
Development.” Global Political
Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order.
Peter Evans (1992) “The State as Problem and
Solution: Predation, Embedded Autonomy and Structural Change,” in S. Haggard
and R. Kaufman, The Politics of Economic Adjustment.
·
Oct. 27: Human Capital Approaches
Robert Wade (1992) “
Blustein, pp. 171-191.
Stiglitz, ch. 2.
Week
6: Midterm, External Financing of Development, Part 1
· Nov. 1: MIDTERM EXAM
· Nov. 3: External Financing of Development, Part 1: Foreign Aid
Blustein, pp. 195-215.
Stiglitz, ch. 5.
Week 7: External
Financing of Development, Part 2
· Nov. 8: Debt
Miles Kahler (1985) “Politics and International Debt: Explaining the Crisis.” International Organization 39,3 (Summer): 357-382.
· Nov. 10: Foreign Direct Investment
Blustein,, pp. 217-240.
Stiglitz, ch. 6.
Week 8: External
Financing of Development: Trade
·
Nov. 15: Comparative Advantage
· Nov. 17: History and Politics
Blustein, pp. 241-253.
Stiglitz, ch. 7.
Week 9: Globalization
and Inequality
·
Nov. 22: Dependency Theory
James A. Caparoso (1978) “Dependence, Dependency, and Power in the Global System: A Structural and Behavioral Analysis.” International Organization 32,1 (Winter): 13-43.
Andrés Velasco (2002) “The Dustbin of History? Dependency Theory.” Foreign Policy 133 (November-December):44-45.
· Nov. 24: Globalization I
Foreign Policy and the Center for Global Development (2003) “Ranking the Rich.” Foreign Policy 136, May-June: 56-66.
Nancy Birdsall (2003) “Asymmetric Globalization.” Brookings Review 21,2 (Spring): 22-27.
James Mittleman (2002) “Globalization: An Ascendant Paradigm.” International Studies Perspectives 3,1 (February): 1-14.
Blustein, , pp. 255-283.
Stiglitz, ch. 8.
Week 10:
Globalization and Inequality, Wrap-up
· Nov. 29: Globalization II
Thomas Friedman and
D. Dollar and A. Kraay (2002) “Spreading the Wealth.” Foreign Affairs 81,1 (January-February): 120-33.
Responders (2002) “Is Inequality Decreasing?” Foreign Affairs 81,4 (July-August): 178-83.
· Dec. 1: Review
Stiglitz, chapter 9.