POLITICAL SCIENCE 410/510: Democracy beyond the State?
University of Oregon, Spring 2008 Instructor: James Ingram
Monday 2-4:50 Office: PLC 927
Room: PLC 605 Phone: 346-4707
Office hours: Tuesday 1-4 jingram@uoregon.edu
Democracy is now established as
the leading principle of political legitimacy around the world, yet in its
traditional forms it is widely agreed to be threatened by globalization. In
this course we will read assessments of the development of transnational and
global politics as well as prospects and proposals for their democratization.
Along with basic issues in democratic theory, we will consider contemporary
efforts to design or reform supranational institutions, debates over attempts
to promote democracy and human rights internationally, and projects to foster
democracy from below.
I assume that we’re coming to this seminar with different backgrounds and interests, and from across the subfields. In order to allow you explore themes of particular interest while keeping the class very much a seminar, the last three sessions will be devoted to discussing student-selected topics. Some topics may be more empirical and others more theoretical. I will provide a longer list of possibilities, and you are especially welcome to pursue topics that relate to past work or to a possible dissertation topic. The only stipulation is that they relate to both transnationalism and democracy. Examples might include:
Obviously,
your reading for the research paper will exceed what we can read together for
the seminar, so your goal for the presentation should be to select writings
that provide a good overview of the issue and promote discussion. The
presentation and discussion will then serve as the basis for the paper due at
the end of the quarter.
All work submitted in this course must be your own and produced exclusively for this course. The use of sources (ideas, quotations, paraphrases) must be properly acknowledged and documented. For the consequences of academic dishonesty, refer to the Schedule of Classes published quarterly. For any specific questions or concerns, please come talk to me before turning in an assignment.
Course Requirements and Grading
Course Readings
All readings will be made available on Blackboard.
Course Schedule and Readings
NB: Readings subject to change.
rec. = supplementary but recommended
3/31: Introduction: Globalization
William Scheuerman, “Globalization,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall 2002/entries/globalization/
Michael Mann,
“Globalizations: an introduction to the spatial and structural networks of
globality,” ms.
Stanley Hoffmann, “Clash of Globalizations,” Foreign Affairs 81:4 (2002): 104-15.
Michael Parenti, “Globalization
and Democracy: Some Basics,” Znet
(May 27, 2007).
rec.: Joseph Stiglitz, Globalization and its Discontents
(Norton 2003).
Thomas Friedman, “It’s a Flat World After All,” New York Times Magazine (April 3, 2005).
4/7: Kantian Cosmopolitanism
Immanuel Kant, “Idea for a
Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose” and “Perpetual Peace,” in Reiss,
ed., Kant: Political Writings
(Cambridge 1991).
Jürgen Habermas, “Does the
Constitutionalization of International Law Still Have a Chance?,” in The Divided West (Polity 2004), 115-78.
Walter Mignolo, “The Many Faces of Cosmo-polis: Border Thinking and Critical Cosmopolitanism,” in Breckenridge, Pollock, Bhabha, Chakrabarty, eds., Cosmopolitanism (Duke 2002), 157-88.
James Tully, “The Kantian Idea of Europe: Critical and Cosmopolitan Perspectives,” in Pagden, ed., The Idea of Europe (Cambridge 2003), 331-58.
4/14: Globalizing Democracy I
[PRESENTATION/REASEARCH
PAPER TOPIC PROPOSALS]
John
S. Dryzek, “Transnational Democracy,” Journal
of Political Philosophy 7:1 (1999): 30-51.
David
Held, “Democracy and Globalization,” in Archibugi, Held, and Köhler, eds., Re-imagining Political Community
(Stanford 1998).
Michael
Saward, “A Critique of Held,” in Holden, ed., Global Democracy: Key Debates (Routledge 1999).
David Chandler, “International Justice” and Nadia Urbinati, “Can Cosmopolitical Democracy Be Democratic?,” in Archibugi, ed., Debating Cosmopolitics (Verso 2003).
rec.: Robert Dahl, “Can International Organizations Be Democratic? A Skeptic's View,” in Shapiro and Hacker-Cordón, eds., Democracy's Edges (Cambridge 1999).
Chantal Mouffe, On the Political (Routledge 2005), ch. 5.
4/21 Globalizing Democracy II
James Bohman, Democracy across Boundaries: From Demos to Demoi (MIT 2007), ch. 1.
Michael Goodhart, Democracy as Human Rights: Freedom and Equality in the Age of Globalization (Routledge 2005), ch. 7.
Michael Hardt and Antonio
Negri, Multitude: War and Democracy in an
Age of Empire (Penguin 2004), chs. 1.3, 3.3.
rec.: Heikko
Patomäki, “Problems of
democratizing global governance: Time, space and the emancipatory process,” European Journal of International Affairs
9:3 (2003): 347-76.
R.B.J.
Walker, “Polis, Cosmopolis, Politics,” Alternatives 28:2 (2003): 267-86.
4/28 Human Rights
Hannah Arendt, “The Decline
of the Nation-State and the End of the Rights of Man,” in The Origins of Totalitarianism (HBJ 1973), ch. 9.
Seyla Benhabib, The Rights of Others (Cambridge 2004),
ch. 2.
Jacques Rancière, “Who is
the Subject of the Rights of Man?,” South
Atlantic Quarterly 103:2/3 (2004): 297-310.
Giorgio Agamben, “Beyond
Human Rights,” in Means without Ends
(Minnesota 2000).
rec.: Chris Brown,
“Universal Human Rights: A Critique,” in Dunne and Wheeler, eds., Human Rights in Global Politics
(Cambridge 1999).
Bonnie Honig, “Another
Cosmopolitanism? Law and Politics in the New Europe,” in Benhabib, Another Cosmopolitanism (Oxford 2006).
Slavoj Zizek, “Against
Human Rights,” New Left Review 34
(2005): 115-31.
5/5: Transnational Activism and Global Civil Society
[PRESENTATION READINGS DUE]
Richard Falk, “Global Civil
Society and the Democratic Prospect,” in Holden, ed., Global Democracy.
Margaret
Keck and Kathryn Sikkink, Activists
Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Cornell 1998),
Introduction.
Sidney
Tarrow and Donatella della Porta, “‘Globalization,’ Complex Internationalism,
and Transnational Contention,” in Transnational
Protest and Global Activism (Rowman and Littlefield 2005).
Kenneth
Anderson and David Rieff, “Global civil society: A skeptical view,” in Anheier
et al, eds., Global Civil Society
Yearbook 2004/05 (Sage 2005), 26-39.
rec:
David Kennedy, “The International Human Rights Movement: Part of the Problem?,”
Harvard Human Rights Journal 15
(2002).
Mario Pianta, “Democracy vs. Globalization. The Growth of Parallel Summits and Global Movements,” in Archibugi, ed., Debating Cosmopolitics (Verso 2003).
Alex
Demirovic, “NGOs, the State, and Civil Society: The Transformation of
Hegemony,” Rethinking Marxism 15:2
(2003): 213-35.
5/12: Presentations I
5/19: Presentations II
(5/26 – MEMORIAL DAY – NO CLASS)
6/2:
Presentations III
RESEARCH PAPER DUE
MONDAY, JUNE 9 AT 4PM